snapped shot

now in ap-approved text mode

 
What happened to the pictures? Exhibit A, Exhibit B
Will they ever come back? Yes and no

ROFL: Al Gore's Blog Pwn3d?

Rooster sends this tip in—Apparently, Al Gore's blog is having a bit of a "tough time" right now, and has unwittingly been hawking "Che4p V1ag4ra" to every search engine that hits it:

Never a more appropriate spokesman!


Wow, indirect Sullivan linkage? I do believe that's a first...
 

Clear the Air (of Smug)

Have we really sunk to such depths in this country, that our marketing agencies actually believe that being smug will help sell vehicles? Max Silvestri says "no," in a most comical way.

(You'll have to click on the link above to see the video—Max's commentary is well worth the effort!)

(h/t Planet Gore, of course!)

Aww, shucks: Thanks, Michelle!
 

The Most Polluted City on Earth

Hint: It's not Bush's Fault!™

(This is something of a continuation of another recent story. It's just so cute to see the Guardian blame "progress" for the woes that this city faces--I could've sworn that it was the leftists over there at al-Guardian who hailed "progressiveness" by any means, wasn't it?)
 

Environmental Marxism: Reheat As Necessary

"The smoke of chimneys is the breath of Soviet Russia."
I ran across an interesting collection of articles over at Instapundit today, which I am highly amused by. Apparently, Sir Nicholas Stern, the British preacher of doom, has been going around repeating the absurd claim that Chinese air-quality standards are too high for the American auto industry to be able to send cars over there.

Of course, there's nothing new about claims like this. I honestly cannot remember a time in my life where the Left has failed to attack the West for things which were, at the very least, not the West's fault.

Tim Blair has done a fantastic job rounding up some other notable Leftists who repeat this claim essentially verbatim. He has also pointed us to Right-Thinking, who has provided first-hand photographic evidence of Chinese environmental policy, which makes Los Angeles look like an ecological paradise.

I remember walking through a Russian bookstore in the suburbs of Maryland (the largest in the country--which, sadly, was forced to close some time ago) that contained thousands of old Soviet books, including the textbooks they used internally, and the ones they sent overseas to other countries in "goodwill" missions--textbooks which, of course, represented the Soviet line. (Not that the Soviets ever tried to communize the world or anything.) Continue reading »
 

PETA's Gonna Have a Cow

PETA's position on biodiesel?
I'm reading a report that Texas is now being served by a "renewable" biodiesel power station. And by "renewable," I mean, "they're burning chicken parts."

For some reason, I have a feeling that the kind folks at PETA won't be too happy with this announcement.
 

American Dim Bulbs

Who woulda thunk it?

When you pool together all the combined energy it takes to drive and build a Toyota Prius, the flagship car of energy fanatics, it takes almost 50 percent more energy than a Hummer - the Prius's arch nemesis.


It should be noted that the Recorder hardly qualifies as being a "conservative" publication, so I guess that means blaming Chimpy Bushitler McHalliburton for this mess is out of the question. Time for all of you Pious owners to pony up and buy s'more "carbon credits," eh?
 

Dim Bulbs

The European Commission
Apparently, this childhood taunt is a fitting depiction of European bureaucrats, who are busy trying to ban incandescent bulbs throughout the European Union. Of course, in typical Enviro-nazi fashion, the ban is being pushed without much of a valid reason. To wit:

  • The "Compact Fluorescent" bulbs which the European Commission is pushing are no more efficient than incandescent ("standard") light bulbs over a long period of time
  • "CF" bulbs can't be placed in enclosed light fixtures, microwaves, refrigerators, etc, which makes them somewhat of a hassle for homeowners
  • The "non-steady" light put out by the "CF" bulbs takes longer to reach full strength, and after it does, it produces a flicker that is noticeable for a large portion of the population
  • These "environmentally friendly" bulbs are manufactured using mercury vapours, which are already considered "environmentally unsafe" in a landfill, and thus requires an expensive recycling process
  • It's been said that the life of a CF bulb is shortened significantly if it is switched on and off regularly, in the same manner as a "standard" incandescent bulb


Of course, if Europe wants to bankrupt itself in the name of some ill-defined and unreachable "principle," who am I to say that they should stop?