Snapped Shot

Always Watching the All-Seeing Eye

 

Finally, the qualifier!

Maths teacher Hussein Hayder smokes a tobacco water-pipe in his apartment in the heavily-bombed town of Srifa in southern Lebanon Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2006. Hussein's apartment was untouched, but up to 601 buildings in the town were either damaged or destroyed—according to a local Hezbollah official. (AP Photo/Ben Curtis)
After all this time, we can finally point to a good example of a well-qualified caption. Take a look at this photo, pulled straight from the AP wires.

For the first time, I can point to a clear example where the press is properly qualifying its sources. We're told, according to Hezbullah, that "up to 601" buildings have been damaged. This, of course, can't possibly be confirmed in such short notice, though the additional odd building included in the count is somewhat humorous. There's little chance that we'll get anything close to an exact count, until well after "international forces" start arriving in the area, and I doubt we'll even hear the actual number then. What's even more impressive about this particular photograph is that it is attributed to the award-winning Ben Curtis, one of the photographers who participated in the Qana debacle.

Aside from the caption, we see a dark and thoughtful picture of this math professor. If it were up to the ominous tone of the image alone, the reader would only be able to guess that this poor gentleman lost his home. It's odd that Mr. Curtis used such an upbeat headline to describe such a dark image, but I suppose it could be a creative exercise in artistic expression.

In any case, it's good to see a slight ray of honesty in a caption. Let's hope that something negative about Professor Hayder doesn't come to light, or I'll have to retract all of these nice things I've said about Ben!

:-)
 
Snap.com Popups

If they're driving you crazy, please click here to disable them on this website.




Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments [RSS]
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Here is what a handful of random people think about this article. But first, the fine print:
The opinions expressed here, even where approved for display, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this website, the management, or any other entity or organization, with the exception of the Vast Zionist Conspiracy. Those opinions we represent in style, yo. Please keep the language in these comments clean, as this is intended to be a family-friendly, work-friendly website. Comments not compliant with this policy will be edited for content where necessary. Abusive or otherwise illegal comments will be reported to the proper authorities, up to and including the aforementioned Vast Zionist Conspiracy. The Management cannot and will not be held responsible for commenters making a spectacle of themselves, even if The Management are the said commenters in question. In other words, don't take yourself so seriously, folks. We're all here to discuss the news, and more importantly, to have fun. Now go get yourself into some OCD treatment program—you obviously need it if you actually read all of this mess.

No comments

Add Comment

HTML-Tags will be converted to Entities.
Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
BBCode format allowed
Gravatar/MyBlogLog/Favatar/Pavatar author images supported.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA