College of William & Dhimmitude?
Why should Christians be expected to have culture?
Be sure to drop a kindly e-mail to Melissa Engimann, the director of the Historic Campus, and share your thoughts with her on this blatant historical revisionism. If the University needs a non-sectarian chapel, perhaps it'd be best if it built a new one, something which would meet the "non-Christian" students' needs without sullying the school's history!
ARGH! Political Correctness is a curse!
Update 29-Oct: Oh, I neglected to mention earlier that there is a Crypt in the Wren Chapel, housing the remains of many notable Virginians:âLord Boutetort, Sir John Randolph, and Peyton Randolph, to name a few.
Do you think these Godly men would want the Chapel they helped build to be desecrated by bullies all in the name of Secularism? I don't!
Update: Neither does Jim Bacon, a self-described secularist who "respects (his) Christian heritage." My hat's off to ya, Jim!
Update: Reader Brad sends in his exchange with W&M President Gene Nichol, who seems to have a gift for illustrating the obvious. Read the exchange following the break!
Brad writes, "Brian, thought you'd laugh at this email exchange with the W&M college prez." Believe me, I'm amused! Thanks for sharing this with us, Brad!
Mr. Nichol might have a point, if the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation weren't the organization responsible for restoring the Wren Chapel to its 18th-century appearance!. GeneâShouldn't you be sure that the folks at the Foundation approve of your historical revisionism before you start messing with their building?
And thanks for pointing out something we both understand.
Very progressive of you to eschew capitalizing your name. How k.d. lang.
On Nov 1, 2006, at 4:53 PM, Gene R. Nichol wrote:
Thanks. William & Mary is a public school. Pepperdine is not. [ed.: highlight mine]
gene nichol
---- Original message ----
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:28:53 -0800
From: Brad
Subject: Wren
To: grnich@wm.edu
Cc: meengi@wm.edu
Dear W&M,
As an undergrad I went to Pepperdine, a school which I think has a few similarities with your own, especially that we had a campus chapel, a rarity nowadays. I can assure you that my heart (and my reasoning mind) would be absolutely sick today if I were to hear that Pep planned to do what you are doing in your chapel.
At first glance no doubt many of us assume that the removal of Christian symbols (THE symbol, even) is to placate Islam and other religions in the news du jour.
The more I think about it, though, the more I suspect the following scenario: get enough progressives to catch the ears of enough politically correct administrators and bureaucrats in our institutions and voila, they can achieve quite literally the ultimate oxymoronic high jinx: remove a cross from a chapel.
So which scenario is correct? Are there really some "Christian" denominations who cannot abide a cross? If so, which? Or are you placating progressive atheists?
If it is the latter, this must be a resounding victory for them. Removing Judeo-Christian references and symbols from hilltops and courthouses pales in comparison!
The million dollar question: will those asking you to do this next ask the local mosque to remove the pesky crescent? Doubtful.
yours very sincerely,
Brad in CA
Mr. Nichol might have a point, if the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation weren't the organization responsible for restoring the Wren Chapel to its 18th-century appearance!. GeneâShouldn't you be sure that the folks at the Foundation approve of your historical revisionism before you start messing with their building?

![[twitter]](/templates/ss50/img/twitter-bledbetter.png)


Let's play "Hide the Cross"
The College of William and Mary has decided to make its famous campus chapel less "faith specific" and more "welcoming" by getting rid of the cross on its altar. Administrators huff that they're not tossing the cross aside--just putting it...