Snapped Shot

Always Watching the All-Seeing Eye

 

Presidential Debate #2: Fun and Follies

I'll be liveflogging the debate over on Twitter this evening, and will probably be joining the Brotherly Band (of Morons) for the festivities as well. Here's to hoping that John McCain uses some of his characteristic anger for a change, and doesn't try to play bipartisan for the cameras.

Bipartisanship works fine in the Senate, I suppose, but Americans prefer to make a choice between two distinct parties.

Which requires, you know, an actual "distinction" between the two.

Long and short? Obama stumbled on the issues a lot. His "plan" for fixing our economy REEKS of Soviet-style central planning, byzantine Government programs, and Fines! Fines! Fines! for anyone who has the audacity to go against the HOPE that only HE can bring. His "plan" for "winning" (even though he didn't use exactly that word) the "War on Terror" was for us to UNILATERALLY INVADE PAKISTAN, which I might add, is a NUCLEAR-ARMED NATION.

To make matters worse, he telegraphed his plan in front of the entire world.

Which is definitely a "diplomatic no-no."

A sure-fire sign that Obama is a neophyte that has no business entering the White House.

Speaking of which, would you be comfortable with an Obambi presidency, given that this jackass will undoubtedly become a "frequent visitor" to the Lincoln Bedroom?

I'm not. And for once, I can comfortably say that it has nothing to do with the color of Obambi's skin.

McCain fumbled on a couple of core Republican issues, but overall was very impressive in how directly he attacked Obama, and how uncomfortable The Chosen One looked after each attack.

I'm saying this was a 1000% McCain win for those very reasons.
 
Snap.com Popups

If they're driving you crazy, please click here to disable them on this website.




Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments [RSS]
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Here is what a handful of random people think about this article. But first, the fine print:
The opinions expressed here, even where approved for display, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this website, the management, or any other entity or organization, with the exception of the Vast Zionist Conspiracy. Those opinions we represent in style, yo. Please keep the language in these comments clean, as this is intended to be a family-friendly, work-friendly website. Comments not compliant with this policy will be edited for content where necessary. Abusive or otherwise illegal comments will be reported to the proper authorities, up to and including the aforementioned Vast Zionist Conspiracy. The Management cannot and will not be held responsible for commenters making a spectacle of themselves, even if The Management are the said commenters in question. In other words, don't take yourself so seriously, folks. We're all here to discuss the news, and more importantly, to have fun. Now go get yourself into some OCD treatment program—you obviously need it if you actually read all of this mess.

DMartyr on 2008-10-08 07:18 #1
*I'm getting so disillusioned by McCain. He isn't going for the throat like he needs to.

For example, Obama mentioned McCain's 23 alternative fuel votes over a period of 26 years. That's less than one vote per year.McCain missed a prime opportunity to contrast his 26 years with Obama's 300 days.

McCain should have responded with something like, "That's true, Senator. Over a period of nearly 3 decades I rejected bills filled with pork-barrel spending. In your extensive 300 days, I'm sure you've found worthy bills unacceptable because of wasteful, self-serving projects added..."

McCain just missed so many opportunities.
Reply  

Add Comment

HTML-Tags will be converted to Entities.
Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
BBCode format allowed
Gravatar/MyBlogLog/Favatar/Pavatar author images supported.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA