Ah, the Joys of Liberalism
Why bother with solving problems like tagging, when you can just keep making things worse?
Good to know that lawmakers in California are so concerned about the rights of lawbreakers.
(I've made sure to underline the key phrases in above sentence for those of you who might be unfamiliar with the concept of "governance.")
Of course, considering that 32 million square feet of tagging is a pretty good indication that California has lost all control of tagging, may I offer the most humble suggestion that maybe the solution isn't yet another muddle-headed law?
In the old days of long ago, when California was still "the" Wild West, there were cases in which crime raced out of control. You know how Californians back then handled things?
The city of Los Angeles had good reason to push a tough anti-graffiti bill through the Legislature, and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger wasted no time in signing it. L.A. pushed the bill not only because taggers did their dirty work at more than 650,000 locations in the fiscal year that ended June 30, but they also were bragging about their work on Internet sites.
How's this for a statistic: In the year ended June 30, taggers defaced nearly 32 million square feet...
...
Critics of the new law contend that a tagger who paints over another gang's graffiti could be put in harm's way. Officials will have to figure out a way to prevent a possible death sentence for taggers, who are not the brightest of people, despite their artistic efforts. Taggers who display their work on the Internet, while divulging their handles, basically dare police to track them down. In that game of chicken, law enforcement has a real advantage.
Good to know that lawmakers in California are so concerned about the rights of lawbreakers.
(I've made sure to underline the key phrases in above sentence for those of you who might be unfamiliar with the concept of "governance.")
Of course, considering that 32 million square feet of tagging is a pretty good indication that California has lost all control of tagging, may I offer the most humble suggestion that maybe the solution isn't yet another muddle-headed law?
In the old days of long ago, when California was still "the" Wild West, there were cases in which crime raced out of control. You know how Californians back then handled things?
Yup, you guessed it: Guns.
If the State of California were really serious about taming the newly re-Wilded west, maybe the government out there ought to start treating itscitizens subjects as more than helpless victims. We are all grownups, are we not? And, as such, shouldn't we be treated as if we are capable of providing for the defense of our own property, instead of risking prosecution for defending ourselves?
The act of tagging shows a serious disrespect for the inherent property rights that are a foundation of our country.
If we can't get past our overly-sensitive, mind-addled selves long enough to figure that out, maybe we're not worthy of keeping it.
If the State of California were really serious about taming the newly re-Wilded west, maybe the government out there ought to start treating its
The act of tagging shows a serious disrespect for the inherent property rights that are a foundation of our country.
If we can't get past our overly-sensitive, mind-addled selves long enough to figure that out, maybe we're not worthy of keeping it.
![[twitter]](/templates/ss50/img/twitter-bledbetter.png)

