Snapped Shot

Always Watching the All-Seeing Eye

 

Holy Cow: AP Caught Stealing from Cookie Jar, Again?

By Brian C. Ledbetter · Tuesday, June 17. 2008 22:19
Blogger Patterico has noticed that the Associated Press lifted 157 words from his blog for one of its recent stories, without compensating him for the exclusive information he provided. This is comical, considering how the Associated Press is in the middle of a little snafu over a blog quoting their articles. Says Patterico:

Now, in a slightly ironic twist, the AP is taking content from a blog site. Namely, mine.

In a news item about the e-mail from Judge Kozinski’s wife that I posted on this site, an AP article lifted numerous passages.


I won't quote any more from Patterico's article, in case he's planning on charging $2.95 per word (just like the other AP). Be sure to hop on over and read the rest—And be sure to get as much of a laugh out of this as I am.

Thanks for the tip, Patterico! I am definitely appreciating the irony of this situation more and more.

See-also:

Ace of Spades HQ, The Jawa Report, doubleplusundead, The American Pundit, Evan Coyne Maloney's brain-terminal, Michelle Malkin, This Goes To 11 [Nigel—the invoice is on its way. ;-) ], Stop the ACLU, Powerline Blog, The Pirate's Cove, Below the Beltway, Confederate Yankee


The AP should hire Nelson Muntz to be their official spokesman.
permalink · Disrespect · Comments (3) · Trackback (1) · digg this
Defined tags for this entry: ,
Related entries by tags:
<u>Wonderful</u> New Word: <i>BONTO!</i>
RNC Busts Through Copyrights at a Mile a Minute!
Cheerleading for the Terrorists
Prosperity
Like Fathers, Like Sons
 

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

Pirate's Cove on 2008-06-18 09:43 #6003

That AP Pay For Play? It’s A Howie Dean/George Bush Conspiracy

By now, most know about the AP’s new project to charge bloggers and other linkers $12.50 to $100 for excerpts, based on number of words. Now, everyone thinks that the AP is shooting itself in the foot. I disagree. Why? Because, in fact, this whol...

Comments [RSS]
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Here is what a handful of random people think about this article. But first, the fine print:
The opinions expressed here, even where approved for display, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this website, the management, or any other entity or organization, with the exception of the Vast Zionist Conspiracy. Those opinions we represent in style, yo. Please keep the language in these comments clean, as this is intended to be a family-friendly, work-friendly website. Comments not compliant with this policy will be edited for content where necessary. Abusive or otherwise illegal comments will be reported to the proper authorities, up to and including the aforementioned Vast Zionist Conspiracy. The Management cannot and will not be held responsible for commenters making a spectacle of themselves, even if The Management are the said commenters in question. In other words, don't take yourself so seriously, folks. We're all here to discuss the news, and more importantly, to have fun. Now go get yourself into some OCD treatment program—you obviously need it if you actually read all of this mess.

captainfish on 2008-06-17 22:46 #1
*Yeah, nothing like placing Fair Usage into the trash can. Charging $2.95 per AP word cited????

Is there a discount if we cite words AP quoted someone else saying? How about if the citor is a minority? Is their a subsidy if the citor is an illegal immigrant?

This will truly bite the (no-name mentioned) in the arse!
Reply  
DMartyr on 2008-06-18 06:53 #2
*The AP is on the offensive to stop bloggers from second-guessing them. Their credibility goes down the toilet every time a blogger like Brian calls them on their inaccuracies and biased reporting.

This tactic is akin to muslimes using "hate speech" accusations to stifle free speech about muhammad and islam. It's a way of silencing the opposition so certain views cannot be challenged.
Reply  
Brooke on 2008-06-19 07:28 #3
*The AP sees themselves as royalty and we are the unwashed rabble. We need to be good little peasants and take what 'news' they so generously give us.

They just can't have us correcting them!
Reply  

Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

HTML-Tags will be converted to Entities.
Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
BBCode format allowed
Gravatar/MyBlogLog/Favatar/Pavatar author images supported.