snapped shot

now in ap-approved text mode

 
What happened to the pictures? Exhibit A, Exhibit B
Will they ever come back? Yes and no

Embedded with the Enemy

I'm sorry, but there really is absolutely no excuse for photos like this. It's an AFP photo, so the link should stay good forever, but just in case, it's also archived here.

Seriously: What "news" does this convey? How does this serve the average newsreader?

As Gateway Pundit has pointed out earlier, Essam al-Sudani is actively involved with the Mahdi Army, but the picture above is well beyond all reasonable limits of news gathering, and has clearly moved into the realm of actively assisting a terrorist group.

If I were a news customer, I would demand that the AFP immediately cease all association with Mr. al-Sudani, and that they remove all of his terrorist propaganda from their archives.

Jan-Edward has more thoughts on this. Via Google Translate, he asks:

There has been in recent months and years been much discussion about whether or not to use as a (photo) journalist embedded with a military unit to work.

That is the question arises: Are there also photographers "embedded" with the other warring parties? (For words like 'rebels',' freedom 'and' terrorists' but even aside to let).

Today I ask this question but again on the agenda, following photos AFP photographer Essam al-Sudani through his press office has published.

Those photos show that Essam al-Sudani zastane Sjiitische with fighters of the Mahdi militia in Basra, for example, he photographs at the time it places a roadside bomb. I still get an uneasy feeling in these and other photographs of the said AFP photographer.


I'm glad I am not the only one thinking this. :-)
 

Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments [RSS]
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Here is what a handful of random people think about this article. But first, the fine print:
The opinions expressed here, even where approved for display, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this website, the management, or any other entity or organization, with the exception of the Vast Zionist Conspiracy. Those opinions we represent in style, yo. Please keep the language in these comments clean, as this is intended to be a family-friendly, work-friendly website. Comments not compliant with this policy will be edited for content where necessary. Abusive or otherwise illegal comments will be reported to the proper authorities, up to and including the aforementioned Vast Zionist Conspiracy. The Management cannot and will not be held responsible for commenters making a spectacle of themselves, even if The Management are the said commenters in question. In other words, don't take yourself so seriously, folks. We're all here to discuss the news, and more importantly, to have fun. Now go get yourself into some OCD treatment program—you obviously need it if you actually read all of this mess.

Kaitian on 2008-03-28 11:37 #1
*I find alot more photographers other than just Essam al-Sudani.

Kareem Raheem
Ahmad Al-Rubaye
Thaier al-Sudani (brothers? and works for Reuters) however he displays the "other side" such as the government of Iraq
Atef Hassan
etc etc.
Reply  
DMartyr on 2008-03-28 18:27 #2
*Things like this make it disturbingly clear that the radical islamic element is far more infiltrated into our society than possible if it were a "small minority" of muslims.
Reply  
captainfish on 2008-03-29 16:11 #3
*OH... MY... GAWD !!!!

If I were over there serving in Iraq, I think I might just have to take a nice little stroll and go find where this guy is bunking down for the night.

This goes beyond the freedom of the press. This moves into treason of freedom. This goes to aiding the enemy which is punishable in all countries. How can the wire services permit this? How can our own country?!?

I have been sick from day 2 when this nation has fought this war as a politically correct war. We need to CLAMP down on info coming out of the two war zones that give aid to the enemy. It is time to arrest more of these kind of terrorist-supporting photogs.

It is not enough to push our view and fight for our rights, but we must also push against those views from the enemy. Recall during WW1 and WW2 when our nation would push pro-military media and prevent all anti-military propaganda.

I fear that this will only get worse once we elect a new president. While the democrat side will actually make us retreat and run in disgrace giving up the innocent Iraqis to the evils of al-queda (the military wing of AP) and Iran, I fear McCain will run a far more "softer" war. He has already shown a proclivity to do away with prisons and holding camps and is not all that supportive of the Iraqi leaders.
Reply  

Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

HTML-Tags will be converted to Entities.
Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
BBCode format allowed
Gravatar/MyBlogLog/Favatar/Pavatar author images supported.