Snapped Shot

Always Watching the All-Seeing Eye

 

The Party of the Rich

By Brian C. Ledbetter · Monday, November 26. 2007 08:55
The Washington Times reported on Friday that a new study proves that the Democratic party is genuinely the "party of the rich."

No, really?

Who would've guessed that a bunch of people who have already made their money would want to prevent others from being able to keep their earnings? Of course, it's not like it's hard to identify which party the ginormous trust funds prefer. I challenge you to find a group with as much money as these to throw around—that isn't funded by somebody's old family trust.
· permalink · Daily Fodder · Comments (4) · Trackbacks (0)
 
Snap.com Popups

If they're driving you crazy, please click here to disable them on this website.




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments [RSS]
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Here is what a handful of random people think about this article. But first, the fine print:
The opinions expressed here, even where approved for display, do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this website, the management, or any other entity or organization, with the exception of the Vast Zionist Conspiracy. Those opinions we represent in style, yo. Please keep the language in these comments clean, as this is intended to be a family-friendly, work-friendly website. Comments not compliant with this policy will be edited for content where necessary. Abusive or otherwise illegal comments will be reported to the proper authorities, up to and including the aforementioned Vast Zionist Conspiracy. The Management cannot and will not be held responsible for commenters making a spectacle of themselves, even if The Management are the said commenters in question. In other words, don't take yourself so seriously, folks. We're all here to discuss the news, and more importantly, to have fun. Now go get yourself into some OCD treatment program—you obviously need it if you actually read all of this mess.

soccer dad on 2007-11-26 10:17 #1
*You think that this:
http://www.memeorandum.com/071126/p7#a071126p7
is a response to your post?
Reply  
Brian C. Ledbetter on 2007-11-26 10:28 #2
*Naw—I'm sure Hernandez wrote the bulk of that article as soon as the Washington Times reported the study on Friday.

It's not like this is news to anybody: Look at every single trust fund that has any amount of money in it, and you'll find that literally billions of dollars are being funneled into boutique Leftist causes. Not a single fund supports conservative politics, with the sole exception of Scaife, a bogeyman from the 80's at the latest.

Regards,
Brian
Reply  
soccer dad on 2007-11-26 13:42 #3
*I meant that it was in response to the article you were citing. I was careless.
Reply  
Brian C. Ledbetter on 2007-11-26 13:43 #4
*Heh, of course that would make more sense. I blame my misunderstanding on lack of coffee, as always. My bad! ;-)

Regards,
Brian
Reply  

Add Comment

HTML-Tags will be converted to Entities.
Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
BBCode format allowed
Gravatar/MyBlogLog/Favatar/Pavatar author images supported.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA